HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

TSUI YAT LUN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6260-EN-1968-11-25

TSUI YAT LUN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000647/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 647 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
TSUI YAT LUNAppellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins J.

Date of Judgment: 25 November 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins J

The appellant appeals against the sentence of 6 months' imprisonment for unlawful possession of three packets containing nearly 1.2 grammes of dangerous drugs. He has advanced before me a very plausible story of wanting to assist his mother but in my view it is no function of this court to extend mercy to cover such circumstances. The only question before me is whether the sentence passed by the learned magistrate was a proper sentence. The appellant has been convicted of unlawful possession of dangerous drugs on two previous occasions and the sentences passed on those occasions appear not to have had the desired defect. The learned magistrate thought that the appellant was in need of proper treatment and supervision if there were to be any hope of his recovery from addiction and I cannot but agree with him. In my view the sentence passed by the learned magistrate was a proper one and this appeal must be dismissed.

 

25th November, 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Sharatte for the Respondent