HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

CHAN KWONG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6353-EN-1968-11-26

CHAN KWONG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000661/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHAN KWONGAppellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 26 November 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J :

The appellant pleaded guilty to housebreaking and larceny. He climbed up to the third floor of premises in Hankow Road, there removed the bar from a window and obtained access into the flat through the window. Having stolen the property listed in the charge, he went out through a door and climbed down a drain pipe at the rear of the premises. He had previous convictions of a similar nature - having been found on enclosed premises with intent and been in possession of housebreaking implements in 1961 ...... and the last similar offence was in 1965. The learned magistrate, in view of the seriousness and prevalence of this type of offence, passed a sentence of 24 months' imprisonment. The appellant has been able to advance no good reason why this sentence should be reduced and the appeal is dismissed.

 

26th November, 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Alexander for the Respondent