HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

LEUNG TAI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6433-EN-1968-12-04

LEUNG TAI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000673/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.673 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
LEUNG TAIAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 4 December 1968

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J:

1. The appellant appeals against the sentence of 15 months' imprisonment imposed for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. He pleaded guilty to this offence.

2. The facts were that on the 10th October he was convicted of smoking dangerous drugs and was sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment. While awaiting trial in the Victoria Reception Centre he was found in possession of a small packet of dangerous drugs. He had a long record involving many convictions for drugs offences and the learned magistrate expressly said that he was passing a deterrent sentence in view of the fact that this offence was committed within one of Her Majesty's prisons.

3. In my view the sentence imposed was a proper one and the appeal must be dismissed.

 

4th December 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Evans for the Respondent