HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

CHU CHEUK KWAN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6479-EN-1968-12-04

CHU CHEUK KWAN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000681/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 681 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHU CHEUK KWANAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 4 December 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J: The appellant was convicted of unlawful possession of dangerous drugs and was sentenced to 9 months' imprisonment. The drugs consisted of traces of diacetylmorphine hydrochloride in a cigarette. The appellant had 3 previous convictions, none of them more recent than 1964 and none relating to dangerous drugs.

2. The learned magistrate took great trouble with this case. He called for a probation officer's report and he called for a report from the prison medical officer. The latter report indicated that the appellant was a confirmed drug addict. The probation officer's report indicated that the appellant had little sincerity or any desire to rid himself of his addiction and that his conduct generally was far from satisfactory. It was only after consideration of these reports that the learned magistrate came to the conclusion that a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment was the only appropriate sentence. I see no reason to disagree with the conclusion which he reached.

3. The appeal must be dismissed.

 

4th December 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Evans for the Respondent