HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

LAI WUN WING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6491-EN-1968-12-04

LAI WUN WING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000683/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 683 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
LAI WUN WINGAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 4 December 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J:

1. The appellant was convicted on his own confession of robbery with aggravation. He was sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment and he appeals against that sentence.

2. At 4.45 in the afternoon of 7th November, on a staircase, the appellant attacked a woman from behind. He grabbed her round the neck and pointed a small pen-knife at her chest. He robbed her of her purse and when the woman then had the courage to shout for help he stabbed her in the chest and ran away.

3. The appellant is 26 years of age and has no previous conviction. He was a carpenter at a shipyard, where he was earning $360.- a month. He has a wife and a son and he says that he remits money to his father in China. His wife is shortly expecting another child.

4. The courts are always loath to send to prison a man who is in gainful employment and who has a clear record previously, but the learned magistrate considered this to be a very serious case. It was a cowardly attack and the sort of offence which unfortunately is all too common in Hong Kong. I am unable to say that this sentence was wrong and the appeal is dismissed.

 

4th December 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Evans for the Respondent