HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

CHAN YIU HUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6521-EN-1968-12-12

CHAN YIU HUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000688/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 688 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHAN YIU HUNGAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 12 December 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J:

1. The appellant was convicted of attempted larceny from the person and appeals against that conviction.

2. The evidence was of the completed offence. The appellant was on a bus. Another passenger had some money in the pocket of his shirt and he found the appellant lifting the money out of the pocket. When the offence was observed the appellant took his hand away, leaving the money half in and half out of the pocket. Two police officers happened to be going down the steps of the bus at the time. The appellant before me has upon this point (as upon others) completely misrepresented the evidence: it was never suggested that these police officers came downstairs as a result of a cry by the victim, although both a police officer and the victim himself said that the victim called out "picking pocket."

2. The appellant before me has merely repeated the story which he told to the magistrate, that he was thrown against the victim when the bus turned a corner and that the evidence against him is a pure fabrication. The learned magistrate rejected that story and I see no reason to disagree with him.

3. The appeal is dismissed.

 

12th December, 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Evans for the Respondent