HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

MA FAI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6593-EN-1968-12-12

MA FAI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000698/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 698 of 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
MA FAIAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 12 December 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J:

1. The appellant was convicted on his own confession of attempted robbery with aggravation. He tried to snatch the purse of a young woman from behind. He was holding a small pen knife in his hand and threatened to stab her. By good fortune two police officers happened to be passing and prevented the commission of the robbery.

2. The appellant had previous convictions - mainly under the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance but none for dishonesty. In these circumstances he maintains that a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment was unduly severe. I do not agree. These offences are prevalent or not to be encouraged by undur leniency.

3. The appeal is dismissed.

 

12th December, 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Evans for the Respondent