HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

YEUNG KING FAI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6714-EN-1968-12-17

YEUNG KING FAI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000714/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 714 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
YEUNG KING FAIAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 17 December 1968

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J: The appellant was charged with importing dangerous drugs unlawfully and with unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. She was arrested at Kai Tak Airport upon her arrival by air from Bangkok. She had in her baggage a quantity of food and in some tins of dried meat were found 13.855 kilogrammes of opium. The learned magistrate imposed sentences of two years' imprisonment on each charge, those sentences to run concurrently.

2. The defence at the trial was that the appellant had no knowledge of the contents of these tins of dried meat: She said that these tins had been given to her as gifts for herself and a Mr. Wong. The learned magistrate disbelieved that evidence and indeed it is difficult to believe that the appellant had no knowledge of such a large quantity of drugs in her baggage.

3. The basis of this appeal has in effect been a plea for mercy. It has been said before that there can be a miscarriage of mercy as well as a miscarriage of justice. The drugs brought in by the appellant could have done inestimable damage and if those who are caught bringing drugs into the Colony are not heavily punished then there is no prospect of stamping out this illegal trade. Upon the findings of the learned magistrate - with which I have no reason to disagree - the sentences were proper ones.

4. The appeal is dismissed.

 

17th December, 1968.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mr. Duckett for the Respondent