HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

CHAN KIN WAH v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6971-EN-1968-01-20

CHAN KIN WAH v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000765/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 765 OF 1968

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHAN KIN WAHAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Briggs, J.

Date of Judgment: 20 January 1968

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. In this case the appellant was sentenced to four consecutive sentences of nine months each on three counts of robbery with aggravation and one count of larceny from the person.

2. I varied the sentences and ordered that the second and third sentences should run concurrently with the sentence imposed on the first charge. Thus the total sum of imprisonment is reduced from three years to eighteen months.

3. I did this for the reasons expressed in the case of Chan Sik Wan(1).

4. The offences the subject matter of the second and third counts were brought to light as a result of a confession made by the appellant when he was in custody for another offence, the subject matter of the first count. No report had been made to the police in respect of the subject matter of the second and third counts and the property has been recovered in each case.

5. I agree with the judgment of the court in Chan Sik Wan v. R.(1) that when no report has been made to the police and they are therefore ignorant of the fact that a crime has been committed as well as of the identity of the criminal, and when a person already in custody for another offence confesses to such a crime, the better course is to ask the accused person if he wishes such offences to be taken into consideration.

 

 

(G.G. Briggs)
Puisne Judge
20 JAN 1968

  

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Addison c.c. for Crown.

 

 

(1) Criminal Appeal No.643 of 1968.