HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1968

TSUI YING MO v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7011-EN-1969-03-06

TSUI YING MO v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000773/1968

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.773 OF 1968.

-----------------

BETWEEN
TSUI YING MOAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Blair-Kerr, J., Hills-Owens, J. & Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 6 March 1969

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

Huggins, J: This is another case where the appellant was convicted of unlawful possession of traces of dangerous drugs. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment. For reasons which we have given in Reg. v. Yu Kwun(1) we are satisfied that the plea was properly accepted.

2. The appellant contended before us that the match-box cover in which the drugs were found did not belong to him but had been borrowed from a friend. He said: " I put it in my pocket and just then the police searched me and found it". He gave no explanation for having pleaded guilty if the story were true. Nor did he advance any reason why the sentence should be reduced. This was his third conviction for this type of offence. In March 1967 he was conditionally discharged for two years but was convicted again 5 months later. He is 37 years of age and has a mother who is wholly dependant upon him.

3. We are unable to say that the sentence was other than a perfectly proper one. The appeal must be dismissed.

 

-6 MAR 1969

 

Representation:

Addison C.C. for Crown/Respondent.

Written judgment handed down.

 

 

(1) Criminal Appeal 785 of 1968.