HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1969

CHAU PAK YAU v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1837-EN-1969-04-28

CHAU PAK YAU v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000211/1969

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.211 of 1969

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHAU PAK YAUAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 28 April 1969

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins,J:

1. The appellant appeals against two sentences of 10 months' imprisonment consecutive on charges of larceny in a dwelling. He has a very long record, the greater proportion of the previous convictions being for drugs offences. He comes before me asking for leniency on the ground that he has two children in China whom he wishes to maintain. It is apparent, however, that a very large part of his income must have been spent not on remitting money to his children but on the purchase of drugs. I see no reason at all to interfere with the sentences passed by the learned magistrate.

2. The appeal is dismissed.

 

28th April, 1969.

 

Representation:

Applicant in person.

Mr. Evans for Respondent.

Judgment pronounced by Huggins J. in Court.