HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1969

FAN KEI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1862-EN-1969-04-28

FAN KEI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000213/1969

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 213 OF 1969

-----------------

BETWEEN
FAN KEIAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 28 April 1969

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Huggins, J:

1. The appellant appeals against a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment passed upon him by the learned magistrate for larceny from the person. He was seen following a number of ladies in the street and finally was seen to snatch a handbag from one of them. After a chase he was arrested. He has six previous convictions, three of them relating to offences of dishonesty and two relating to dangerous drugs. The last conviction was for membership of a Triad Society and professing to be an office bearer of an unlawful society. For these triad offences he was sentenced to 9 months' imprisonment and placed on two years' police supervision in May of last year. Then he was sentenced to three months imprisonment for larceny and this offence was committed on the 5th of February, 1969, when he has not been long out of prison.

2. The appellant says that he committed the larceny offences because of his drug addiction and assures me that he has been cured of his addiction since February. He alleges that his sister is to be married in China in August and asks for leniency so that he may attend the wedding.

3. Having regard to the appellant's record I see no reason to interfere with the sentence imposed by the learned magistrate and the appeal is dismissed.

28th April, 1969.