HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1969

TSANG CHI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2100-EN-1969-06-02

TSANG CHI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000234/1969

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.234 OF 1969

-----------------

BETWEEN
TSANG CHI KEUNGAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Williams, J.

Date of Judgment: 2 June 1969

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The accused was convicted in the magistrate's court for soliciting passengers to travel for hire or reward in his car contrary to Reg. (3) of the Road Traffic (Registration and Licensing of Vehicles) Regulations, Cap.220 and fined $25.

2. He was also convicted for using the same vehicle on a road at the same time when not covered by Third Party Insurance contrary to s.4(1) of Motor Vehicle Insurance (Third Party Risks) Ordinance, Cap.272.

3. He appeals against both convictions.

4. There was ample evidence on which the magistrate could convict for soliciting if he believed the police witness. He did believe him. Moreover, in evidence the accused stated that he had gone to the taxi stored in Ice House Street, for the very purpose of soliciting passengers.

5. The evidence showed that the accused was plying for hire. He had gone to a taxi stored to pick-up passengers. The reasonable inference is that he was in the business of carrying passengers and therefore he should have been insured accordingly.

6. This appeal was supported in so far as the conviction for being uninsured is concerned, on the same grounds and by the same arguments as in Criminal Appeal No.246 of 1969. There is no need for me to repeat my judgment in that case which covers the points raised on this appeal.

7. The appeals against both convictions are dismissed.

 

 

(J.T. Williams)
Puisne Judge.

 

2nd June, 1969.

 

Representation:

D.B. Gunston for Appellant.

M.J. Alexander c.c. for Respondent.