HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1969

HUNG LAM KEI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6021-EN-1969-09-24

HUNG LAM KEI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000618/1969

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 618 OF 1969.

 

Between:
HUNG LAM KEIAppellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Rigby, S.P.J.

Date of Judgment: 24 September 1969

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was convicted of possession of dangerous drugs for that purposes of trafficking therein. He was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment, and he now appeals against that sentence.

2. The facts of the case were that in the early evening of 14th July, a police party carried out a surprise raid in a narrow lane leading to Des Voeux Road. In the course of the raid they found a number of Chinese gathered round a wooden box placed in the lane. On the box were bowls containing packets of dangerous drugs. The appellant was seen sitting behind the box, but he was arrested as he ran away. There was the evidence of one police officer that he had a cloth bag tied round his neck, containing a quantity of money. There was ample evidence to establish that he was caught red-handed selling these dangerous drugs.

3. There were substantial quantities of dangerous drugs involved and the appellant has a number of previous convictions of precisely the same type of offence. I am satisfied that there are no grounds whatsoever for interfering with the sentence and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

 

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Penlington, P.C.C. for Crown/Respondent.

Judgment delivered.