HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1969

YU WING FUK v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7288-EN-1969-03-13

YU WING FUK v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000853/1969

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 853 OF 1969

-----------------

BETWEEN
YU WING FUK (2nd Accused)Appellant
AND
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Full Court (Briggs, Mills-Owens and Huggins JJ.)

Date of Judgment: 13 March 1969

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was convicted of robbery with aggravation and sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years and six strokes of the cane. In addition he was ordered to be under Police supervision for two years when he comes out of prison.

2. He appealed against conviction and sentence. The Court below did not ask for a Probation report nor for a medical report as to his fitness to undergo corporal punishment. The Court called for both a Probation and a medical report, which were served on Counsel for the appellant.

3. The appellant is 21 and has six previous convictions. On January 18th 1969 he was placed on probation for 18 months having been convicted of robbery. The offence which is the subject matter of this appeal was committed on July 31st 1969.

4. The Court dismissed the appeal against conviction. The medical report stated that the appellant was unfit to undergo corporal punishment. The Court, therefore, varied the sentence by quashing the order for corporal punishment and directed that the time spent in prison pending the hearing of the appeal should count towards sentence.

 

 

(G.G. Briggs)(R. H. Mills-Owens)(Alan Huggins)
PresidentAppeal JudgeAppeal Judge

 

Representation:

Martin Lee (C. C. Lee & Co.) for Appellant.

Corcoran, S.C.C. for Respondent.

Oral Judgment reduced into writing.