HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1969

WAN KAY v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7615-EN-1969-03-07

WAN KAY v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000097/1969

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.97 OF 1969

-----------------

BETWEEN
WAN KAYAppellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 7 March 1969

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

Huggins, J:

This is a hopeless appeal. The appellant has three previous convictions for dangerous drugs offences starting in 1964. It is clear that in each case diacetylmorphine hydrochloride was involved. On the first occasion he was given a chance to go straight and did not take it. He has served sentences of four months' and eight months' imprisonment. It appears that on the latter occasion he was sent to Chi Ma Wan and received treatment. I am satisfied that the appellant is an addict and that anything less than nine months would be wrong in principle.

2. The appeal is dismissed.

 

7th March, 1969.

 

Representation:

...(illegible)