HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1970

CHEUNG WING-HUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2229-EN-1970-06-16

CHEUNG WING-HUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000246/1970

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 246 OF 1970

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHEUNG Wing-hungAppellant
AND
The QueenRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Mills-Owens J. in Court.

Date of Judgment: 16 June 1970

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant appeals against a sentence of detention in a Training Centre on a conviction for robbery with aggravation on his plea of guilty. He is 16 years of age. The circumstances of the offence are serious but not unduly so. It appears that he and another youth robbed another youth of 60 cents but used some violence in the course thereof. Neither, however, was armed with any offensive weapon. The learned magistrate, as he indicates in his findings, was persuaded to impose a sentence of detention in a Training Centre by reason of the appellant's mother agreeing to that course and the appellant himself also agreeing thereto. On learning that the appellant was appealing the magistrate has indicated that in view of the appellant's change of heart he would if he had the matter before him again consider binding over the appellant. The appellant has a clear record and in view of this and of his age I am inclined to agree that he may be given a chance. Accordingly I substitute a conditional discharge (in the sum of $300 for one year). If he is to be given a real opportunity to make a fresh start it is desirable that a conviction should not be recorded and I so order.

 

 

(Mills-Owens J.)
16th June, 1970

 

Representation:

Astin C.C. for Crown.

Appellant in person.

Oral judgment reduced into Writing.