HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1970

KWOK CHUN HUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7616-EN-1970-04-07

KWOK CHUN HUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000097/1970

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 97 OF 1970

-----------------

BETWEEN
KWOK CHUN HUNGAppellant

AND

THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Rigby, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 7 April 1970

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant is a young man aged twenty-two. He pleaded guilty to the charge preferred against him of smoking a dangerous drug.

2. Despite his youth, he has a quite deplorable record of offences, including not only possession of dangerous drugs but also crimes of dishonesty.

3. The learned Magistrate sentenced him to six months' imprisonment. I am quite unable to say that that sentence is either manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. However, I adjourned the case in order that I could ascertain whether or not the Prison Authorities would be prepared to accept him at the Tai Lam Addiction Treatment Centre, since he is an acknowledged drug addict. Indeed, he has already undergone one period of treatment at this Centre but it was apparently of no success in curing him of his addiction.

4. I now have the report before me from the Victoria Reception Centre saying that they are prepared to give him a second chance and to accept him again at the Tai Lam Addiction Treatment Centre.

5. In those circumstances, bearing in mind his youth, it seems to me that if there is any reasonable possibility that he may be cured of his addiction it is worth taking that chance. I propose, therefore, in the particular circumstances of this case, to allow this appeal and to set aside the sentence and in lieu thereof make an Order directing that he be sent to the Tai Lam Addiction Treatment Centre.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Winter, C.C. for Crown/Respondent.