HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

TSE FU WAH v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1918-EN-1971-05-11

TSE FU WAH v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000218/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 218 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
Tse Fu WahAppellant
and
The QueenRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Mills-Owens J.

Date of Judgment: 11 May 1971

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

1. This case, which came before me this morning, on appeal from the Magistrate, Mr. Ware, raises the question whether sentences of corporal punishment and detention in a Training Centre may properly be combined. The learned Magistrate discusses the matter at some length (p.7 of the Record). The appellant is 16 years of age and pleaded guilty to three offences of robbery - in substance robbing youngsters by punching a threatening to punch them and taking, in two of the cases their money, and in the third case a wristwatch. The sentences imposed were -

Charge A - 6 strokes of the cane;
Charge B - 6 strokes of the cane; (cumulatively);
Charge C - Training Centre.

The caning had already been carried out, the appellant waiving appeal in respect thereof so that the appeal is confined to the sentence to detention in a Training Centre.

2. As it appears to me, a point of principle arises and accordingly I refer the appeal to the Full Court.

 

 

(Mills-Owens J.)

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Lucas, S.C.C. for C/R.