HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

CHIU MAN MO v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1980-EN-1971-05-11

CHIU MAN MO v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000223/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 223 OF 1971

-----------------

BETWEENChiu Man MoAppellant
and
The QueenRespondent

Coram: Mills-Owens J.

Date of Judgment: 11 May 1971

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. This case is similar - in terms of the offence for which the appellant was convicted - to Criminal Appeal No. 224 of 1971 where on appeal I reduced a sentence of 9 months imprisonment to 4 months. In each case the offence was 'going equipped for stealing' contrary to the Theft ordinance. The sentence in this case also was 9 months imprisonment, a sentence which I upheld on appeal because of differing circumstances. In case No. 224 the 'equipment' was a razor blade, obviously intended for slitting pockets for the purpose of larceny, whereas in the present case the appellant was armed with a knife, hidden in his sleeve, and followed females up staircases with the intention of threatening them with the knife in order to rob them, which is plainly a more serious matter.

(Mills-Owens J.)

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Lucas, S.C.C. for C/R.