HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

WAN KI WANG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2710-EN-1971-06-08

WAN KI WANG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000292/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 292 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
WAN KI WANGAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 8th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant was convicted on his own confession on charges of robbery and membership of a Triad Society. He was sentenced to detention in a Training Centre.

2. He and another man went to a flat and obtained access by ringing the bell and bursting in when somebody answered the door. The two of them threatened these inside with pen knives. They cut the telephone cables, demanded money and took money, and then bound and gagged one of the occupants before making their escape.

3. The Appellant now has the audacity to say he committed this offence "out of curiosity". He is 20 years of age and has a clear record. Unfortunately the Probation Officer's report was far from favourable and the Probation Officer suggested that strict disciplinary training was required. In the light of that report and of the seriousness of the offence itself I do not see that the learned Magistrate could have done anything else but order some form of detention. The offence of membership of a Triad Society in all the circumstances adds very little to the case, but I am satisfied that this was an entirely proper sentence and the appeal is dismissed.

 

8th June, 1971.

 

Representation: