HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

NG KA CHAI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2731-EN-1971-06-04

NG KA CHAI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000294/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 294 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN:
NG KA CHAIAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 4th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant, a man of only 19 years of age, was sentenced to 9 months' imprisonment for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. He was found with one packet containing morphine and two packets containing barbitone. Despite his age he has already been convicted on three previous occasions for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. On the first occasion he was bound over to be of good behaviour for one year, but within that year he was again convicted and sent to the Drug Addiction Treatment Centre. Within a year he was convicted again and returned to the Drug Addiction Treatment Centre. The learned Magistrate, in my view rightly, took the view that what this young man needs is a sharp lesson. I can only hope that the sentence imposed will do what is necessary. I certainly cannot say it was wrong and the appeal is dismissed.

 

4th June, 1971.

 

Representation: