HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

TSUI KIT v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2890-EN-1971-06-08

TSUI KIT v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000307/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 307 of 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
TSUI KITAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 8th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant pleaded not guilty to a charge of unlawful possession of dangerous drugs and he now appeals against his conviction.

2. The evidence was given by a police constable, that he saw the Appellant acting suspiciously and that when he was stopped and searched a packet containing dangerous drugs was found upon him. Necessary evidence of identification of the drugs was produced. The case before the Magistrate and before this Court has been that the whole allegation was a frame-up by the police. The issue was fairly and squarely before the learned Magistrate and he had no hesitation in believing the prosecution. There was evidence to justify conviction and the appeal must be dismissed.

 

8th June, 1971.

 

Representation: