HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

CHAN TAK v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2912-EN-1971-06-29

CHAN TAK v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000309/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 309 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
CHAN TAKAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 29th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant appeals against a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment for theft. This is a common type of case where the Appellant was seen by the police to pick the pocket of somebody who was entering a bus. After committing the offence the Appellant walked quickly away. He was followed by a detective constable and a struggle ensued. The Appellant was found holding money in his hand and the victim subsequently reported that he had had his pocket picked.

2. The Appellant is 36 years of age and has been convicted on 9 previous occasions for larceny from the person or attempted larceny from the person and on a number of occasions of loitering with intent to commit a felony or similar offences. This rather detracts from the weight of the story which he tells to me: he suggests that his wife was pregnant with her fifth child and wanted an abortion and that he (the Appellant) stole in order to raise the money for this. He is no new comer to this type of crime. Moreover, he tells me that he and his wife had a combined income at the time of about $600 a month.

3. In all the circumstances a sentence of 15 months' imprisonment; was by no means too heavy. Had it not been that his last conviction for this type of offence was in 1968 I can readily imagine that the sentence would have been heavier. The appeal is dismissed.

 

29th June, 1971.

 

Representation: