HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

LAI BIU v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3055-EN-1971-06-30

LAI BIU v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000322/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 322 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
LAI BIUAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 30th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant appeals against concurrent sentences of 6 months' imprisonment imposed on three charges of theft.

2. He was seen in the street in the early hours of the morning. He was searched and found to be carrying a car radio and two screw drivers. The police questioned him about these and he confessed that he had stolen the radio from a private car. Subsequently he admitted to the police that he had stolen a tyre from another car and that he had stolen some electric wire belonging to the Telephone Company from outside premises in Muk Cheong Street.

3. The learned Magistrate took account of the fact that the Appellant had freely confessed to the police and may, perhaps, have been over generous, at least in respect of the first charge, when he suggested that but for the confession the Appellant would have been charged only with unlawful possession, for it does appear that the owner of the radio himself discovered the theft, although we are not told whether he himself went to the police or the police went to him.

4. The Appellant has a large number of previous convictions, most of them involving dishonesty. In all the circumstances I think that these sentences erred, if at all, on the side of leniency. The only argument addressed to me by the Appellant has been one which was addressed to the learned Magistrate: he says that his father was injured in a traffic accident and needs the Appellant's support. In my view the sentences were such that I could not possibly interfere with them. The appeal is dismissed. If the Appellant's father requires any assistance, an application should be made to the Social Welfare Department.

 

30th June, 1971.

 

Representation: