HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

LAM KWAN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3083-EN-1971-06-30

LAM KWAN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000325/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 325 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
LAM KWANAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 30th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant appeals against a sentence of 6 months' imprisonment for theft. He stole a pair of trousers from a house in Ning Po Street. He asked for three further offences of theft to be taken into consideration, the property concerned being electric wire belonging to the China Light and Power Co., Ltd., a water-meter and some door handles, all of which required disconnection from the premises to which they were attached.

2. The Appellant has a number of previous convictions for dishonesty and in all the circumstances this sentence was certainly not excessive. The Appellant's plea in mitigation before the Magistrate and before me relates to his physical state of health. The nature of his complaint appears to have changed between the trial and the appeal but, whetever his trouble, he can receive treatment in prison. I see no reason to interfere with this sentence.

 

30th June, 1971.

 

Representation: