HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

KWONG KIT v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3107-EN-1971-06-30

KWONG KIT v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000327/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 327 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
KWONG KITAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 30th June, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant appeals against a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. He was found in possession of one packet of a mixture containing salts of esters of morphine.

2. The Appellant had been convicted on four previous occasions of unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. He has been to the Tai Lam Addiction Centre and has also received treatment voluntarily at Shek Kwu Chau. In February of this year he apparently initiated an application for re-admission to Shek Kwu Chau but unfortunately he did not pursue that application and consequently he was not accepted. The learned Magistrate attached some significance to the fact that the Appellant even considered applying for re-admission and thought that there was even now some possibility that he could be cured of his addiction. For that reason he imposed a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment which would give the Appellant the opportunity of receiving further treatment. In all the circumstances I think that was a right decision and the appeal is dismissed.

 

30th June, 1971.

 

Representation: