HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

HO FOOK PANG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3212-EN-1971-07-14

HO FOOK PANG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000336/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 336 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
HO FOOK PANGAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 14th July, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant was charged under s.27 of the Theft Ordinance with going equipped for stealing. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to nine months' imprisonment. He appeals against that sentence.

2. The Appellant was seen by two police officers acting in a suspicious manner in the street. They kept him under observation for some time and then arrested him. Upon searching him they found an iron rod 5 inches in length in his right hand and, upon being questioned, the Appellant admitted that he intended to use it to crack jade bracelets on the wrists or women in the street and that he intended to steal the broken pieces.

3. When brought before the court he asked that another offence be taken into consideration, that offence consisting in the successful theft of pieces of broken bracelets which he himself had broken in the manner which he was contemplating in relation to the substantive offence. The bracelet that he stole on that occasion was valued at $800.

4. The Appellant has been before the courts on numerous previous occasions and the offences with which he has been charged included a number of larcenies from the person, robbery with aggravation and loitering offences. For his first offences he was treated with considerable leniency and on two occasions he has been bound over to be of good behaviour. On both those occasions he committed further offences within a matter of a few weeks.

5. In all the circumstances I think that this sentence of nine months' imprisonment was justifiable and the appeal is dismissed.

 

14th July, 1971.

 

Representation: