HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

CHAN MO YIU v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3223-EN-1971-07-14

CHAN MO YIU v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000337/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 337 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
CHAN MO YIUAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 14th July, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant was charged with possession of dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking and with possession of apparatus fit and intended for injection of a dangerous drug. He pleaded guilty to both charges and was sentenced to two years' imprisonment and four months' imprisonment concurrent. He appeals against those sentences.

2. The police carried out a raid on a lighter and as they approached the Appellant, who was the only person on board, appeared to be trying to escape. He was arrested and in his possession were found sixty-six packets of dangerous drugs consisting of morphine and barbitone, a syringe, two needles and a spoon round which was wrapped a piece of cotton wool. Traces of morphine were found in the syringe, on the needles and on the piece of wool. The Appellant was co-operative with the police and gave the name of a person who, he said, had employed him to sell these drugs at a morning wage of $25. He claimed that the other items found in his possession were for his own use and belonged to him.

3. The Appellant has nine previous convictions under the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance and the learned Magistrate thought that a deterrent sentence was appropriate. I see no reason to disagree with the view which he took and the appeal is dismissed.

 

14th July, 1971.

 

Representation: