HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

HO SHEK PING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3822-EN-1971-07-28

HO SHEK PING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000395/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL JO. 395 OF 1971

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
HO SHEK PINGAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Pickering, J.

Date of Judgment: 28th July, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of Going Equipped for Stealing and asked that an offence of theft of a car radio valued at $200 should be taken into consideration. At the date of his conviction he was under conditional discharge following a conviction for Possession of Dangerous Drugs and the learned magistrate dealt also with that charge, sentencing the appellant to 9 months' imprisonment on the charge of Going Equipped for Stealing and 9 months' imprisonment for Possession of Dangerous Drugs, the sentences to run concurrently.

2. In the case of MOK Wing-luk and the Queen (Criminal Appeal No. 287 of 1971) dealing with the offence of Going Equipped for Stealing, my learned brother, Huggins, J., said:

"In view of the history of this type of charge the learned Chief Justice has in a number of recent cases reduced sentences of 9 months' imprisonment to ones of 6 months' imprisonment and it is desirable that there should be uniformity of sentencing."

3. I respectfully agree and it is for that reason that I allow the appeal in the present case to the extent that the sentence of 9 months' imprisonment on the charge of Going Equipped for Stealing will be reduced to 6 months' imprisonment. The appeal against sentence on the charge of Possession of Dangerous Drugs is dismissed that sentence being well deserved in view of the appellant's previous record of conviction on twenty-four occasions - many of them multiple convictions and many of them associated with dangerous drugs.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Duckett S.C.C. for Crown.