HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

WONG CHEUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
5884-EN-1971-09-29

WONG CHEUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000600/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 600 OF 1971

-----------------

BETWEEN
WONG CHEUNGAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Pickering, J.

Date of Judgment: 29th September, 1971.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was charged with going equipped for stealing and now appeals against the sentence of 9 months imprisonment imposed upon him as a result of his plea of guilty.

2. The sentence was imposed by the same learned magistrate who, in Criminal Appeal 407 of 1971, explained a sentence of the same length by reference to the case of "Person"(1). It seems apparent that the judgment of this Court from the appeal against sentence in Criminal Appeal 407 of 1971 has not yet reached the magistrate.

3. In that case I said that the "significant sentence" in Hong Kong has come to be regarded as standing in the region of 6 months rather than 9 months and, in an effort to secure uniformity of sentencing, I allowed the appeal in that case to the extent that the sentence of 9 months imprisonment was reduced to one of 6 months.

4. The same result must obtain in the present case, and the appeal is allowed and the sentence reduced from 9 months to 6 months.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Soh, C.C. for Crown.

 

 

(1) 1969 C.A.R. 640