HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1971

CHAN SHUI YIN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6964-EN-1971-12-13

CHAN SHUI YIN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000764/1971

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 764 OF 1971

-----------------

BETWEEN
CHAN SHUI YINAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Pickering, J.

Date of Judgment: 13 December 1971

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant in this case pleaded guilty to a charge of smoking a dangerous drug and was sentenced to nine months imprisonment. He has spent two periods in Drug Addiction Treatment Centres and has a previous conviction for smoking a dangerous drug. It is apparent that there is no merit in his appeal against sentence and that appeal is dismissed in so far as it relates to the present charge.

2. In his Statement of Findings, however, the learned magistrate points out that he overlooked the fact that at the date of his trial the appellant was in breach of bond having been bound over in the sum of $300 for twelve months on the 2nd September last, for smoking a dangerous drug; in the result the appellant was not dealt with in respect of this earlier offence.

3. Substituting for the learned magistrate, I sentence the appellant to one month's imprisonment in respect of this offence of smoking a dangerous drug and order that his bond be forfeited and that he be sentenced to two weeks imprisonment in default of payment. All terms of imprisonment to be consecutive.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Winter, C.C. for Crown.