HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1972

WONG CHING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2517-EN

WONG CHING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000275/1972

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 275 OF 1972

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 WONG CHINGAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Leonard, J.

Date of Judgment:

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was arrested at a hut on a hillside near Block 5, Shek Kip Mei Resettlement Estate. The appellant had 2 phials of dangerous drugs in his underpants. Two further phials were found under a mattress; the appellant admitted they were his and that his hut was being used by others for the purposes of smoking heroin. The total amount of drugs found was 7.3 grammes and the heroin contained in the mixture was 2.5 grammes.

2. This case is different from the ordinary case of a person arrested in the street in possession of a small quantity slightly above the amount giving rise to the presumption. The drugs were found in a house in which a number of people were actually smoking as well as in the appellant's underwear on the appellants person. This case then did not call for the "tariff" sentence. The appellant has an extremely bad record and the sentence of two years' imprisonment cannot be regarded as manifestly excessive.

3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

 

 

 (P.F.X. Leonard)
 Puisne Judge

 

Representation: