HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1972

CHAN WING-HOI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3875-EN-1972-02-22

CHAN WING-HOI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000004/1972

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 4 OF 1972

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
CHAN Wing-hoiAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Leonard J. in Court

Date of Judgment: 22nd February, 1972

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

Leonard J.:

1. In this case the appellant pleaded guilty to two charges of petty theft. He was stopped and searched by an alert police officer on the 9th of December 1972 and in a parcel he had a transistor radio and a lady's green cardigin. He candidly told the police that he has stolen them from different premises on the same day at approximately the same time. Had it not been for his candour the offences might not have become known to the police and he would not have been charged with them.

2. The learned magistrate imposed sentences of 4 months' imprisonment on each change to run consecutively. I sympathize with this approach having regard to the appellant's bad record but although appreciating that two offences had in fact been committed I consider that the sentences should be concurrent because of the manner of their discovery.

3. This appeal is therefore allowed to the extent that the sentence shall concurrent and not consecutive.

 

 

(P.F.X. Leonard)
Puisne Judge

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Carollan, C.C. for Respondent.