HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1972

WONG WOON-KWAN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4828-EN-1972-07-25

WONG WOON-KWAN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000492/1972

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 492 OF 1972

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 WONG Woon-kwan 
 and 
 THE QUEEN 

-----------------

Coram: Full Court (Briggs & Leonard, JJ)

Date of Judgment: 25.7.72

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The Appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. He appeals against that sentence.

2. On June 7th 1972 the Appellant was arrested for another offence. Enquiries revealed that he was not involved in that case. During those enquiries he confessed to the present case.

3. The facts of the present case are as follows: early in the morning of May 28th the Appellant robbed a man on a staircase. The Appellant approached him from behind and grabbed him from behind. No weapon was used. The Appellant approached him from behind and grabbed him from behind. No weapon was used. The Appellant stole a wrist watch, a cigarette lighter, and $35.

4. The victim of the attack did not report the robbery to the Police. So the matter would not have come to light if the Appellant himself had not told the Police that he had committed the present offence. The watch and lighter were recovered and restored to the owner. Though the Appellant has a record of previous convictions for similar offences, we think that the Magistrate did not give enough weight to the fact that the only evidence of the crime was provided by the Appellant himself.

5. The sentence of 3 years imprisonment will be quashed and we substitute a sentence of 18 months therefor. The sentence will date from today's date.

 

 

 (G.B. Briggs)
 Puisne Judge
 25.7.72

 

Representation:

Appellant in person

Mrs. Jackson-Lipkin, C.C. for Crown/Respondent