HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1972

LAM WAH v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6556-EN-1972-11-27

LAM WAH v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000692/1972

  

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

  

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 692 OF 1972

-----------------

  

BETWEEN  
 LAM WAHAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 27th November, 1972.

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

1. The Appellant appeals against a sentence of twelve months' imprisonment for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. He was found to have one packet containing 0.4 gramme of a mixture containing 0.2 gramme of salts of esters of morphine. His complaint is that some defendants have been sentenced to shorter terms of imprisonment although they had more drugs. I can well understand that they have. The Appellant is a man of 27 years of are and he already has been before the court on five previous occasions for unlawful possession of drugs. On two occasions he was bound over: on one he was placed on probation. He has been to a Training Centre and he has been to a Drug Addiction. Treatment Centre. He has been given every possible assistance to give up this addiction to drugs. He has not availed himself of the opportunities offered. With a record like that I fail to see how he can consider this an excessive sentence. It was entirely proper and the appeal is dismissed.

  

27th November, 1972.

  

Representation: