HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1972

CHENG CHUN-CHUEN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6870-EN-1972-11-30

CHENG CHUN-CHUEN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000744/1972

  

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

  

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 744 OF 1972

-----------------

  

BETWEEN  
 CHENG Chun-chuenAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 30th November, 1972.

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

1. The Appellant appeals against a conviction for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. He was arrested in the street after he had been searched and a packet of dangerous drugs found in his trousers pocket. The packet was found to contain dangerous drugs.

2. The plea, when the Appellant was originally arraigned, and his unsworn statement at the trial were that nothing was found on him when he was searched but that the police planted the drugs on him. This was a case where it was one man's word against another, the Appellant's evidence being unsworn. The learned magistrate decided that the police officer was telling the truth and I have no reason to believe that he came to a wrong conclusion.

3. The appeal is dismissed.

 

30th November, 1972.

  

Representation: