HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1973

LAU CHING-WAH v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6073-EN-1973-08-21

LAU CHING-WAH v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000623/1973

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 623 OF 1973

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 LAU Ching-wahAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Cons, J.

Date of Judgment: 21 August 1973

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was convicted of careless driving. While proceeding along the centre lane of a three lane carriageway, she wandered slightly into the near side lane and collided, albeit gently, with a stationary bus. It appears she was distracted by a driver behind sounding his horn either to give warning that he was about to overtake or to encourage her to proceed at a somewhat faster pace. Although she had filed notice of appeal against conviction as well as sentence her solicitor abandoned the former at the hearing. That appeal was therefore dismissed.

2. It is the appellant's first offence of any kind since acquiring her licence in November 1971. She was fined $250, her licence ordered to be endorsed and disqualified for four months. Complaint was made only as to the order for disqualification. It was submitted that it was unusual and excessive. With that submission I agree. It was not a serious case of careless driving and to my mind disqualification would be too heavy a punishment. The fine imposed was appropriate and sufficient. The appeal against sentence was therefore allowed to the extent of removing the order for disqualification.

 

 

 ( D. Cons)
 Puisne Judge

 

Representation:

Mr. Stapp, Sr. C.C. for Respondent

Mr. John Ip of John Ip & Co. for Appellant.