HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1973

CHIN KWOK-YING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7498-EN-1974-01-04

CHIN KWOK-YING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000927/1973

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 927 OF 1973

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 CHIN Kwok-yingAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Cons, J., in Court.

Date of Judgment: 4th January, 1974.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was sentenced on his own plea to six months' imprisonment for smoking opium. It is a heavy sentence for this offence even allowing for the appellant's record. I appreciate that opinions in favour of such a sentence in circumstances similar to the present have been expressed elsewhere, although not in court. They are opinions of great weight but did not, I am told, reflect the general opinion on that occasion and do not, so far as I am aware, reflect the general sentencing practice for the time being. I agree with the learned magistrate that a sentence of imprisonment was proper in this case but think that one of three months would have been more appropriate. That reduction would have allowed the appellant to go free at about this time and I accordingly reduced the sentence to allow that to happen.

 

 

 (D. Cons)
 Puisne Judge.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Corrigan, C.C., for Crown.