HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1974

LAM TAT @ LAN FAI v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
3732-EN-1974-06-27

LAM TAT @ LAN FAI v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000386/1974

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 386 OF 1974

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 LAM TAT @ LAN FAIAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 27th June 1974.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. This appeal against sentence I am not prepared to deal with today. The Appellant was lest year sentenced by a magistrate to a suspended sentence of nine months' imprisonment. That sentence is still operational but has not taken effect and under s.109C of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance it was mandatory for the learned magistrate upon the conviction to which this appeal relates to consider the suspended sentence. There were certain courses open to him, including the possibility that he might make no order with respect to the suspended sentence - although it must be emphasised that he could do that only if he gave reasons for so doing. The fact is that the sentence which I am concerned with must be considered in the light of all the circumstances, including the course which is going to be taken in respect of the suspended sentence. I therefore propose to adjourn this appeal and to remit the case to the learned magistrate to comply with s.109C, and thereafter the present appeal will come back to this Court. The Appellant will also have the opportunity, if he sees fit, to appeal against any order made under s.109C. If he does so appeal then the two matters can no doubt be dealt with together.

 

27th June 1974.

 

Representation: