HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1974

CHENG CHO-LAM v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4517-EN-1974-07-27

CHENG CHO-LAM v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000460/1974

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 460 OF 1974

-----------------

 

BETWEEN:  
 CHENG Cho-lamAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 27th July, 1974.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was found guilty of being in possession of dangerous drugs for the purpose of unlawful trafficking and was sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment. He was unrepresented.

2. Various grounds of appeal were filed and it is only necessary to deal with one. This ground was that the appellant is Chiu Chow and this fact was known to the magistrate who tried the case. The appellant gave evidence in the court below and called witnesses. Their evidence was also given in the Chiu Chow dialect. However, the witnesses called for the prosecution, who were police witnesses, gave their evidence in Punti. It is not recorded whether the evidence of the prosecution witnesses was interpreted into the Chiu Chow dialect for the benefit of the appellant.

3. In those circumstances, I ordered that the conviction and sentence imposed in this case be set aside and that the case be retried by another magistrate. I also ordered that there be a speedy retrial.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

  

Representation:

Supreme Court Library