HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1974

NG KWOK-HUNG v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7641-EN-1974-03-15

NG KWOK-HUNG v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000098/1974

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 98 OF 1974

 

BETWEEN:  
 NG Kwok-hungAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Leonard & Trainor, JJ.

Date of Judgment: 15th March, 1974.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to four charges of robbery, one of the robberies occurred on a staircase and the other three took place in lifts. Three of the Victims were women and a knife was used in each case.

2. The appellant has a bad record including convictions for twelve charges of robbery. He was sentenced by the District Court Judge to fifteen months on each charge, the sentences to be consecutive, making a total of five years in all.

3. We do not think that the sentence of five years is too great, taking into consideration the circumstances of the robberies and the record of the appellant. However, we think that each separate charge should reflect the seriousness of the offence in its sentence. We allow the appeal to the extent of varying the sentence imposed in the court below and substitute a sentence of five years for each of the four charges, the sentences to be concurrent.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Eric Li. S.C.C., for Crown/Respo. dent.