HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

YEUNG KA LIN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
1999-EN-1975-05-05

YEUNG KA LIN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000225/1975

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 225 OF 1975

-----------------

 

BETWEEN  
 YEUNG KA LINAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Huggins, J.

Date of Judgment: 5th May 1975.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. This is an appeal against a sentence of nine months' imprisonment for unlawful possession of dangerous drugs. The Appellant was found in possession of a cigarette containing less than 0.1 gramme of salts of esters of morphine. The sentence was one which is normal for this type of offence but it was urged upon me that the only previous conviction under this Ordinance was in 1964, that the Appellant had gone straight for over ten years and that he committed the present offence only under stress when he lost his job.

2. I have had the advantage of a report from a Probation Officer and not without some hesitation I have decided that this is a case where I can properly interfere. The Appellant is a seaman and he has assured the Probation Officer that he will now have no difficulty in obtaining a post at sea. The Probation Officer has not said that he thinks that that is unduly optimistic, but he has expressed the view that the Appellant might well take advantage of any chance which was given to him.

3. In these circumstances I shall allow the appeal. The sentence of imprisonment is set aside, but I shall record a conviction and make an order of conditional discharge.

 

5th May 1975.

 

Representation: