HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

KOK TO AND OTHERS v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
2878-EN-1975-06-04

KOK TO AND OTHERS v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000306/1975

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 306 OF 1975

-----------------

 

BETWEEN:  
 KOK TOAppellants
 CHOW Fat-sung 
 WONG Kam-shui 
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 4th June, 1975.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The three appellants pleaded guilty to the theft of fourteen fish from the Plover Cove Reservoir. It was alleged that the fish were the property of the Government of Hong Kong and no point was taken on this issue. The appellants were sentenced to six weeks' imprisonment. They have appealed against that sentence.

2. All three appellants bear good characters and have clear records. Their ages are between 28 and 35 years. When passing sentence the magistrate said that he imposed a sentence of imprisonment as a deterrent. He said that this was not a mere case of someone angling for fish for pleasure but the fish were netted and were obviously going to be sold.

3. The appellants, who were represented at the hearing of the appeal, stated through their counsel that they had been deeply shocked by the sentence of imprisonment and that they had learned their lesson. I note that they had been granted bail pending the hearing of the appeal by the magistrate.

4. Although there have been other cases of stealing fish from the Plover Cove Reservoir, in my view this is a minor offence. I do not think it is a case in which a remedial custodial sentence should be imposed and I order that the sentence imposed by the magistrate on each appellant be suspended for eighteen months.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

Gunston (Gunston & Chow) for all appellants

Haldane for crown.