HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

LAM YEUK-YUEN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
4591-EN-1975-07-04

LAM YEUK-YUEN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000469/1975

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 469 OF 1975

-----------------

 

BETWEEN:  
 LAM Yeuk-yuenAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 4th July, 1975.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to the offence of indecent assault and was sentenced to two months' imprisonment. The appellant is aged 24, is a married man with a child and has a clear record.

2. Nowhere in the record of this case is there any mention made of the age of the victim but I was told at the hearing of the appeal that she was aged 23.

3. The indecent assault could be described as one of a relatively minor nature and it was reported at once by the victim to the police who set a trap and the appellant was caught.

4. I do not think that a sentence of two months' imprisonment for such an offence is a proper sentence. Taking everything into consideration I allow the appeal and set aside the sentence of imprisonment and substitute a sentence of $500 or 2 months' imprisonment in default. The appellant is to have seven days in which to pay.

5. It is unfortunate that there is no power to suspend for an offence committed under section 7 of the Protection of Women and Juveniles Ordinance because a suspended sentence of imprisonment would have been a very proper sentence here.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

Paul Fok (R. Tang & Co.) for appellant.

E. Soh for crown.