HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

LAU CHOR v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
5291-EN-1975-07-15

LAU CHOR v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000534/1975

  

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

  

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 534 OF 1975

-----------------

  

BETWEEN:  
 LAU ChorAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 15th July, 1975.

  

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

  

1. The appellant pleaded guilty to the offence of corruptly offering a sum of money to a clerk of the Urban Services Department. The appellant had been out of work for some ten months and was desirous of being employed as a Pest Control labourer. Having passed an examination set by the Urban Services Department successfully, the appellant was told that he could not be employed at that time since there was no vacancy. The appellant thereupon offered certain sums of money to a clerk of the Urban Services Department. A trap was set and the appellant was caught.

2. The appellant is aged 40 years and has five young children to support. His wife is expecting a sixth child. The appellant has been in custody since the 27th May, 1975. The appellant has a clear record. In view of the personal circumstances of the appellant I think it would be right in this case to suspend the sentence of six months for a period of eighteen months and I so order.

  

  

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

  

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Reid for crown.