HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

TUNG KEI-PIU v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6531-EN-1975-09-17

TUNG KEI-PIU v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000689/1975

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.689 OF 1975

-----------------

BETWEEW:
TUNG Kei-piuAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J., Huggins & McMullin, JJ.

Date of Judgment: 17th September, 1975

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. In this case, the appellant pleaded guilty to one offence of robbery. The victim, who is a woman, was robbed by the appellant and in order to achieve his object he produced a knife and pointed it to her throat. He took from her a wrist watch, a ring and a purse which contained some $17. The appellant then fled but he was hotly pursued by the victim who raised an alarm. Various members of the public gave chase and the appellant was caught. Particularly praiseworthy is the conduct of a passenger in a public light bus named CHAN Kwok-tung. He alighted from the bus and chased the appellant, caught and subdued him although the appellant threatened him with a knife and struggled.

2. The appellant has eight previous convictions, the longest he has served for any one offence is a period of nine months' imprisonment.

3. The trial judge sentenced the appellant to five years for this offence and, in addition, reactivated a suspended sentence of six months which was passed on him in December last year, the offence being claiming to be a member of a triad society.

4. We think, in the circumstances of this case, a sentence of five years was excessive and we reduce the five years to 3½ years. However, the reactivated sentence will stand. In the event, the appellant will serve a total of four years in all.

(Geoffrey Briggs)
President.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Marash, C.C. for Crown/Respondent.