HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

CHAN LAI-WING v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
6784-EN-1975-09-10

CHAN LAI-WING v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000728/1975

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 728 OF 1975

-----------------

BETWEEN:
CHAN Lai-wingAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 10th September, 1975.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was found guilty of being in possession of an offensive weapon in a public place and sentenced to two years' imprisonment. He has appealed against sentence. The weapon was a fruit knife.

2. The appellant had only very recently come out of prison where he had been serving a sentence for robbery. In 1972 he was given a sentence of nine months' imprisonment for an offence similar to that for which he is now before the court. However, I think the sentence of two years is too long in the circumstances and the appeal against sentence is allowed to the extent that a period of one year is substituted for that of two years.

 

(Geoffrey Briggs)
Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Gall, c.c. for Respondent/Crown