HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1975

TAM KAM-CHUEN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
7543-EN-1975-11-07

TAM KAM-CHUEN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC000940/1975

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

 

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 940 OF 1975

-----------------

 

BETWEEN
TAM Kam-chuenAppellant
and
THE QUEENRespondent

-----------------

Coram: Cons J.

Date of Judgment: 7th November, 1975.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. The appellant was convicted of disorderly conduct following an altercation with a police constable on the issue of a fixed penalty ticket. He has mentioned to me several witnesses who could and should have been called at the trial. No criticism can be leveled at the learned magistrate who presided over that trial. The fault is entirely the fault of the appellant. But I do not think he then correctly appreciated the situation and should now be given the chance to bring those witnesses forward in his defence. The conviction and fine are therefore set aside and the case is remitted to the North Kowloon Magistracy for hearing before another magistrate.

2. There will need to be some changes in the wording of the particulars of the offence as charged, of which counsel for the Crown has already taken note.

 

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Eddie Soh, C.C., for Crown.