HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal1976

SO CHUN-MAN v. THE QUEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1992THE QUEEN v. WONG MOK DIN
  • CAAR11/1986THE QUEEN v. CHUNG WAI-YIU
  • CAAR12/1986THE QUEEN v. HSU SAI-MAN AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR15/1986THE QUEEN v. WU KAM MING AND OTHERS
  • CAAR15/1987THE QUEEN v. LEUNG WING FAI
  • CAAR16/1987THE QUEEN v. PANG CHEUNG KIM
  • CAAR19/1986THE QUEEN v. CHAN CHI MAN
  • CAAR22/1986THE QUEEN v. WONG TAK-CHI
  • CAAR23/1986THE QUEEN v. MA LAI WU AND OTHERS
  • CAAR4/1986THE QUEEN v. LY XUONG THANH
  • CAAR5/1986THE QUEEN v. YEUNG KAM-WAH (D1) AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR8/1986THE QUEEN v. ALBERT STANLEY MALIA
  • CAAR9/1986THE QUEEN v. CHU TAI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR9/1989THE QUEEN v. CHAN KOON KWOK ARTHUR
  • CACC1000/1976LAI FAT v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC1000/1983THE QUEEN v. LEE HEI KEUNG
  • CACC1001/1979LAW WAI-MING AND ANOTHER v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1972LIU KAM-MAN v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1973LO WAI KEUNG v. THE QUEEN
  • CACC100/1977TAM YUK-MUI (F) v. THE QUEEN
819-EN-1976-12-04

SO CHUN-MAN v. THE QUEEN

HTML content

CACC001218/1976

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT 
  
 Criminal Appeal
 1976 No. 1218

 

BETWEEN:  
 SO Chun-manAppellant
 and 
 THE QUEENRespondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 4th December, 1976.

 

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

 

1. This is an appeal against a sentence of two years' imprisonment passed on the appellant for the offence of perjury. The appellant pleaded guilty.

2. He gave false evidence to assist a cousin in a civil case. That case, however, was dismissed and the appellant's evidence was not believed.

3. The appellant has a history of psychiatric trouble and has tried to commit suicide at least on two occasions. He has a clear record.

4. Taking all the circumstances into consideration I think the period of two years' imprisonment is excessive and so the appeal of the appellant is allowed to the extent that a sentence of one year's imprisonment is substituted for the sentence of two years.

 

 

 (Geoffrey Briggs)
 Chief Justice.

 

Representation:

P. Woo (Kwong, Lam & Chan) for Appellant.

Lucas for the Crown/Respondent.